In a development favorable to the capital’s water utility Tallinna Vesi (CPI reported), the Supreme Court said it will not review the Competition Authority’s complaint regarding the company’s legal interpretation of its pricing mechanism. The agency has argued that the water utility’s tariff mechanism is a civil law contract, which the company can not use in administrative court. However, Tallinna Vesi maintains that the rate-setting rules, which were established during privatization, are an administrative contract.
Full Content: ERR
Related Content: Tallinna Vesi investigations
Related Content: Regulation by Declaration: A Novel Regulatory Mechanism to Limit Abuse of Monopoly Power
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS and UnitedHealth Demand FTC Chair Recuse Herself from Insulin Price Suit
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Australia Unveils Largest Merger Reforms in Nearly 50 Years
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Breaking Up Google? DOJ Floats Major Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Walmex Awaits Antitrust Ruling as Mexican Regulator Probes Alleged Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Crypto.com Sues SEC, Alleging Regulatory Overreach in Crypto Industry
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh