The European Commission (EC) has released information regarding a potential breach of EU antitrust rules by world-renowned fashion designer Pierre Cardin and largest licensee Ahlers. The agreement between the two organizations has limited cross-border trade of Pierre Cardin-licensed clothing as well as sales to specific customers over the past decade in the European Economic Area (EEA).
The EC expressed their view stating “Consumers in the EU must be able to shop around for the best deals. Our concern is that the licensing and distribution practices of Pierre Cardin and Ahlers, its largest licensee, may have prevented consumers from benefiting from lower prices and a greater choice of clothing.” Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager continued to explain the situation and emphasized the need for active competition between retailers.
The coordination between Pierre Cardin and Ahlers ultimately led to an established ‘absolute territorial protection’, violating EU rules that prohibit such agreements between organizations. This commission alerted the companies when it first obtained evidence of the potential competition law breach in December 2019.
Related: EU Opens Antitrust Probe Into Couture Designers
The decision has neither been approved nor rejected, and no legal outcome is guaranteed. If approved, the Commission’s decision would be legally binding and may face fines up to 10% of the company’s annual accumulated sales. No regulations have been confirmed yet, as Pierre Cardin and Ahlers have been granted a right to defend themselves and present arguments at a meeting with the Commission.
Ahlers is not the only name associated with the fashion industry in the spotlight, as Dyson is also seeking for potential competition law breach. Both companies are seeking a conclusion from the commission due to the looming legal findings.
The potential breach in the fashion industry will be closely monitored by the EC as Erling Dörflinger, spokesman for Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager, confirmed: “The case is still ongoing and therefore we are not in a position to provide any further information at this stage.”
Source: EC Europa
Featured News
FTC and State Attorneys General Sue John Deere Over Repair Restrictions in Antitrust Case
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Enbridge Wins Legal Battle Against Ducere’s Antitrust Allegations
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
GOP Pushes for Antitrust Authority Consolidation Under DOJ in New Legislation
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Canadian Government Approves Bunge-Viterra Merger with Conditions
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Sues Elon Musk Over Delayed Disclosure of Twitter Stock Ownership
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand