The European Commission and MEPs reached an agreement late Tuesday on a way to expand the rights of cartel victims, say reports, as the groups sought to preserve the effectiveness of the EU’s leniency program.
According to reports, the new policies will seep into member states’ legal systems to facilitate consumers’ pursuit of legal action against anticompetitive companies. Reports say member states’ courts will have the power to force those companies to hand over information regarding the case, and will allow the victims several years to seek compensation for the collusion from the time regulators publish their decision on companies’ wrongdoings.
The policy changes aim to address consumer concerns over obstacles faced when pursuing litigation against anticompetitive firms. In the past, victims have reportedly had trouble obtaining evidence or covering the cost of such litigation.
Follow-on actions have been filed in various member states, but reports say the Commission hopes to facilitate the process.
”This directive will remove the barriers that currently prevent the victims of antitrust infringements in the EU from obtaining effective compensation,” European Commissioner Joaquin Almunia announced, adding that the changes will also ensure a balance between actions for damages from those companies and competition enforcement.
Among the top concerns for authorities regarding the changes included worries that consumers, when accessing company documentation and evidence, would also see incriminating statements from companies that filed for leniency from antitrust sanctions under the EU leniency program. But reports say MEPs and the Commission have compromised to limit the circumstances under which victims can obtain that information.
Full Content: European Voice
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li