A group of leading European companies, including Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Airbus, and 15 others, have voiced strong opposition against a draft plan that could potentially allow major US tech firms such as Amazon, Alphabet’s Google, and Microsoft to secure highly sensitive EU cloud computing contracts. This criticism targets a proposal by Belgium, under its current European Union presidency, aiming to establish a certification scheme (EUCS) for the cybersecurity of cloud services.
The proposal seeks to facilitate the selection of secure and trusted cloud service vendors by EU governments and companies, as reported by Reuters. However, it notably omits previous sovereignty requirements, which mandated US tech giants to form joint ventures with EU-based companies for data storage and processing within the bloc to earn the EU cybersecurity label.
Set for discussion by cybersecurity experts from the 27 EU countries on March 15, the Belgian plan could lead to the European Commission adopting this cybersecurity scheme in the upcoming autumn. The consortium of EU companies has urged national authorities and senior Commission officials to reject the proposal, citing significant concerns over data sovereignty and security.
Related: Cloud-Computing Providers See AI As Business Driver
“The inclusion of EU-HQ and European control requirements in the main scheme is necessary to mitigate the risk of unlawful data access on the basis of foreign laws,” the companies stated in a joint letter, highlighting the potential for European data to be accessed by foreign governments under laws like the U.S. Cloud Act or the Chinese National Intelligence Law told Reuters.
The EU firms argue that the cybersecurity label should emulate the Gaia-X cloud computing platform, which incorporates sovereignty requirements to lessen EU dependency on Silicon Valley tech giants. They warn that the absence of such clauses could disadvantage emerging EU cloud providers against their larger US counterparts.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI