Europe’s second-highest court on Thursday, December 13, slashed an EU antitrust fine handed down to Deutsche Telekom four years ago by about a third to €19 million (17.09 million pounds), saying that EU regulators had erred in calculating the penalty.
Deutsche Telekom welcomed the decision but said it was not convinced by all aspects of the judgment and would consider appealing to the European Court of Justice.
Europe’s largest telecoms provider and its Slovak Telekom unit were sanctioned by the European Commission in 2014 for squeezing out competitors by charging unfair wholesale prices in Slovakia.
The EU competition enforcer said the anti-competitive practice to shut out competitors from the Slovak market for broadband services lasted more than five years.
The two companies were given a joint fine of €38.84 million while Deutsche Telekom was also hit with an additional €31 million penalty.
The companies subsequently challenged the EU decision at the Luxembourg-based General Court.
The Court said a parent company’s liability can exceed that of the subsidiary if there are factors which reflect the former’s conduct for which it is held liable.
However, in this case, what was at fault was the basis used by the Commission for assessing the additional fine.
“Deutsche Telekom’s turnover is not capable of reflecting its individual conduct in the infringement at issue and … it therefore could not serve as a basis for the calculation of an additional fine imposed on the latter,” judges stated.
They also cut the joint fine from €38.84 million to €38.06 million.
Deutsche Telekom said it viewed as problematic the court’s finding that rulings in national competition cases can be treated as the basis for determining an antitrust violation under European law.
Further, Deutsche Telekom said in a statement, that the court had failed to provide clarity regarding procedural errors on the part of the European Commission’s economic analysis and calculation methods in the case.
The Commission may also appeal to the EU Court of Justice but only on points of law.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Trump Administration Steps Up Pressure On EU Digital Laws
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Elton John Slams UK Government’s AI Copyright Plan as ‘Theft’
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Anthropic’s Legal Team Blames AI “Hallucination” for Citation Error in Copyright Lawsuit
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Antitrust Fine in Ongoing Legal Battle
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chairman Highlights Fiscal Responsibility and Consumer Protection in House Testimony
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas