The EU General Court backed the European Commission’s decision to fine two chemical companies for allegedly participating in a cartel as two companies’ appeals of the sanctions were rejected.
Arkema and Elf Aquitaine were fined in 2009 by the Commission, along with eight other companies, for participating in a price-fixing scheme that manipulated tin and heat stabilizer costs; the materials are used in everyday materials including packaging and credit cards.
Arkema and Elf Aquitaine lost appeals to those fines with the EU General Court this week, along with consulting firm AC-Treuhand that also appealed its fines.
The failed appeals come three years after sanctions against two other companies were revoked as the Commission found its original decision to issue the penalties to be wrong.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI