European Union judges ruled on Tuesday, March 19, that Italy’s rescue plan for an ailing bank five years ago was legal, prompting calls for compensation for savers who subsequently faced stricter terms because Brussels had rigidly interpreted the bloc’s rules.
In a blow to EU antitrust regulators, the General Court annulled a European Commission decision that rejected the Italian plan for Tercas and forced Rome to recoup financial aid to the bank.
After the dispute with Brussels over the rescue of Tercas, Italian authorities intervened to help four other small banks in 2015 and then saved larger Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and two smaller north-eastern Italian banks in 2017.
Those rescues were conducted under less favorable terms for the banks and their creditors, because of the EU’s rejection of the Tercas plan, the Italian banking association (ABI) said in a statement, urging the Commission to reimburse lenders and savers who lost money “due to the consequences of its wrong decisions.”
The rescue of Tercas, which was sold to Banca Popolare di Bari as part of the plan, was orchestrated by Italy’s deposit guarantee fund, the Fondo Interbancario di Tutela dei Depositi (FITD), a private entity fund.
The Commission said that the FITD illegally acted on behalf of the Italian state and ordered it to recoup €300 million (US$340 million) of grants and guarantees it deemed as State aid.
But the General Court dismissed this reasoning.
“The FITD acted independently when it adopted the measures for the benefit of Tercas,” it said in a statement.
A Commission spokesman stated that the EU executive “will carefully study the judgment and reflect on possible next steps.”
Banca Popolare di Bari stated it would consider possible legal action against the Commission and potential claim for compensation.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand