Two companies lost their appeal of cartel fines in the European Court of Justice on Thursday. The Court denied the $84.5 million fine appeal initiated by Dow Chemical Co. following the sanction by the European Commission in 2006. Dow as part of five companies fined for rigging rubber prices; Bayer was also found to have participated in the cartel but was not fined as it was part of the EU’s leniency program. The ECJ also upheld a more-than $188 million fine issued to transport manufacturer Schindler Holding AG following an appeal of the fine issued by the Commission in 2007 for price-fixing and bid-rigging. The escalator and elevator maker was one of five firms fined for the cartel; sanctions totaled more than $1 billion. The regulator found the companies, which included ThyssenKrupp, colluded between 1995 and 2004 in various EU nations. ThyssenKrupp won a reduction of its fine in an appeal in 2011.
Featured News
Tech Policy and Regulation Weekly Roundup
Jan 23, 2026 by
CPI
Perkins Coie Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Leader as Partner in Washington
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Ryanair Boss Dismisses Musk’s Buyout as Starlink Feud Escalates
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Extends Warner Bros Bid as Netflix Rivalry Heats Up
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Breaks New Ground With Landmark AI Law
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark Rosman & KaDee L. Ru