European Union regulators are reportedly leaning towards a full-scale investigation into Lufthansa’s bid for a minority stake in ITA Airways, as they have not sought feedback from rivals and customers on the proposed remedies. According to three individuals with direct knowledge of the matter, this development indicates that the European Commission may have reservations about the adequacy of Lufthansa’s proposed solutions to address antitrust concerns.
Lufthansa officially submitted its offer to the European Commission on January 8, outlining remedies that included relinquishing slots at Milan-Linate Airport. These slots, currently overlapping with ITA Airways on several European routes to Lufthansa hubs in Frankfurt, Munich, Vienna, and Zurich, were expected to address competition concerns, as reported by sources familiar with the matter.
In a departure from standard procedures, the European Commission has refrained from initiating a market test, which typically involves seeking feedback from industry rivals and customers on the effectiveness of proposed remedies. The absence of a market test in this case suggests that the EU executive may not view Lufthansa’s proposed remedies as sufficient to alleviate antitrust concerns.
Read more: Lufthansa Nearing Deal To Buy 40% Of ITA Airways
The EU competition enforcer’s preliminary review of the deal is set to conclude on January 29, after which a decision on whether to proceed with a full-scale investigation is anticipated. The Commission, however, has declined to comment on the ongoing developments.
An Italian government source echoed the likelihood of a full-scale EU inquiry, affirming Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti’s comments from the previous month. This aligns with the concerns that the European Commission has regarding Lufthansa’s proposed remedies, hinting at the possibility of a more in-depth investigation into the bid for a minority stake in ITA Airways.
Source: Finance Yahoo
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand