The European Union is conducting an antitrust investigation on Apple Pay due to its tap-to-pay platform. Recently, investigators requested additional information from retailers regarding the usage and availability of mobile payment platforms.
In a statement made nearly a year ago, the European Union presented its initial opinion that Apple engaged in anti-competitive behavior by limiting access to the iPhone’s NFC chip for mobile payment platforms. The EU argued that this hinders the ability of other payment platforms to compete with Apple, resulting in fewer options for consumers.
The European Commission sent a list of questions to retailers regarding Apple Pay and other mobile payment platforms. They have confirmed that they are examining other mobile payment technologies, such as those using QR codes and Bluetooth.
The availability of alternative mobile payment solutions, such as QR codes and bluetooth technologies, are being explored by the EU as an examination of options to Apple’s near-field communications chip. Two individuals, who requested anonymity, provided this information.
Read more: Consumer Group Joins EU Apple Antitrust Case
Apple’s digital wallet enables users to store virtual credit and debit cards as well as tickets on their iPhones, and the NFC chip allows for tap-to-pay transactions at a cash register. However, there are concerns raised by rival payment providers that Apple’s strict control over NFC antenna access violates EU competition regulations.
Some mobile payment platforms using QR code technology have faced resistance from consumers. Kroger, for instance, switched to Apple Pay after its QR code-based “Kroger Pay” failed to generate interest. Meanwhile, Walmart has chosen to stick with its QR code payment platform, even though some customers prefer Apple Pay.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh