A small team of European Union officials is spearheading an investigation that could force some of the world’s biggest companies to pay billions of euros in avoided taxes, reports the FT.
In an office block in one of Brussels’ less fashionable districts, the 10 Competition Directorate staff from across the bloc have spent two years poring over hundreds of deals agreed between companies and member-states’ tax authorities.
Their findings were the basis on which the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, last week ruled that Starbucks Corp and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV benefited from illegal tax deals with the Dutch and Luxembourg authorities. The EU said these deals represented unfair state aid that gave the companies an unfair advantage and ordered the countries to reclaim €20mil-€30mil from each.
The Commission continues to investigate other rulings including one Luxembourg gave Amazon.com Inc and rulings Ireland gave Apple Inc, that allowed those companies to earn billions of dollars tax free. If Commission rulings are executed, it could force a sea change for hundreds of multinationals operating in Europe, whose strategies to avoid tax have triggered public anger since the global financial crisis of 2007-2009 left governments strapped for cash.
Headed by Max Lienemeyer, who specialised in competition and trade law before joining the Commission in 2003, the team of Eurocrats has been initiating cases, scrutinising inter-company transactions, and negotiating with companies and governments, to decide whether so-called “transfer prices” allowed the companies to unfairly reduce their tax bills.
Scrutinising corporate tax arrangements is a painstaking task that is usually undertaken by experienced tax investigators.
Full content: The Economic Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand