Ride-sharing service Uber comes before the European Court of Justice on Tuesday, as it attempts to clarify its legal standing in the EU and escape strict regulations that would hampered its progress in the market.
The US company is making the argument that it is a digital platform, not a transport service.
It will have Finland, Greece, Poland and The Netherlands – where its European headquarters are based – supporting it in court, as well as the European Free Trade Association.
Ireland, France and Spain, meanwhile, have stated in written submissions that the California firm should be treated as a taxi service.
It comes at a time when the European Commission is hoping to boost the EU’s sluggish e-commerce sector and a ruling against Uber would reverberate around the bloc. Over 200 participants have signed up for the hearing, with a grand chamber of 15 judges set to ultimately decided Uber’s fate.
Since launching its app on European soil five years ago, Uber has faced fierce opposition from local councils and taxi companies. They are concerned that, if only subject to relaxed, startup-style regulation, Uber would have an unfair competitive advantage and that it could have further implications when it comes to matters of insurance, safety and workers’ rights.
Full Content: The Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Spain’s BBVA Remains Optimistic About Hostile Takeover of Sabadell
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Seek Dismissal of Texas Antitrust Lawsuit
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
EU to Boost Metal Sectors with Energy Relief and Safeguards
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Players’ Association Sues Tennis Governing Bodies Over Alleged Antitrust Violations
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Moves to Curb Big Tech’s Power with New Regulatory Bill
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li