Facebook has rejected the concerns of the UK competition regulator over its acquisition of Giphy, a provider of popular animated images, and said it shouldn’t have to sell the company, reported Reuters.
Facebook bought Giphy in 2020 with the intention of integrating it with Instagram. In August this year, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority stated it had provisionally found that the deal would harm competition between social-media platforms and in the display advertising market and that it could force Facebook to sell Giphy.
Related: UK Regulator Says Facebook’s Giphy Deal Raises Competition Concerns
In a letter published Wednesday, September 8, by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), Facebook argued that the regulator had failed to show a substantial effect on competition and that no remedies were necessary.
Facebook also stated there were “serious questions” as to whether the CMA could enforce an order for it to sell Giphy.
“These are questions which the CMA must carefully consider, and address, before taking the extreme intrusive step of ordering the sale of a company which does not carry on business in the UK,” Facebook stated.
The CMA last month hinted that Facebook, the world’s largest social media company, might need to sell Giphy based on its preliminary findings that the deal would hurt the display advertising market and other social media networks.
While far from the largest deal Facebook has ever done, the Giphy acquisition, could be the company’s first high-profile deal to be unwound by government officials since Facebook began confronting questions about its powerful position in digital markets several years ago. And it shows how closely officials are watching Facebook’s every move.
In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson said the company disagrees with the finding and that it lacks evidence. “This merger is in the best interest of people and businesses in the UK — and around the world — who use Giphy and our services,” the spokesperson said. “We will continue to work with the CMA to address the misconception that the deal harms competition.”
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI