Federal Court slams Clear Telecoms for misleading bundled offer and third line forcing
The Federal Court has made declarations by consent that Clear Telecoms engaged in both misleading and deceptive conduct and third line forcing in its bundled telecom sales. Clear Telecoms, which no longer exists, had offered deals that bundled telecom services with free equipment rental agreements and call credits. Two small businesses signed up for the offer, but were also unknowingly signed up with an unrelated finance company, as a matter of third line forcing.
Featured News
Jury in Boston Set to Decide Takeda’s Fate in Amitiza Antitrust Trial
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
OnlyFans Faces New Antitrust Lawsuit
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Americans’ Opposition to Hosting AI Data Centers Hardens, Survey Finds
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
NextEra Energy Agrees to $9.5 Million Settlement in Nuclear Industry Wage-Fixing Case
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Agency Raids Petrochemical Firms in Price-Fixing Probe
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos