By: Dani Rodrik (Project Syndicate)
Productivity has long been recognized by economists as the key driver of prosperity. Sustained improvements in living standards can only be achieved when a country efficiently produces more goods and services using fewer resources. Throughout history, innovation has been the primary means of achieving this productivity growth, leading to the common association between technological progress, research and development, and productivity in the public’s perception.
Our understanding of how innovation enhances productivity is largely influenced by everyday business experiences. Companies that embrace new technologies often witness increased productivity, enabling them to outperform their technologically stagnant competitors. However, it’s important to distinguish between a productive firm and a productive society. What may promote productivity within a business context might not necessarily work, or could even have adverse effects, at the scale of an entire country or economy. Unlike companies that can selectively focus on improving the productivity of specific resources they utilize, a society must strive to enhance the productivity of all its people collectively.
Unfortunately, many economists and others have failed to fully grasp this distinction, operating under the assumption that technological progress will eventually benefit everyone, even if its immediate gains primarily favor a small group of firms and investors. In their insightful new book, economists Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson emphasize that historically, this assumption has not always held true. While the Industrial Revolution marked the onset of modern economic growth, it took nearly a century for most ordinary workers to experience tangible improvements in their well-being…
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI