FTC Chair Criticizes Boeing for Monopolization, Warns of ‘Too-Big-to-Fail’ Status
Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan delivered a scathing critique of the national champion strategy, labeling it “catastrophic” for the United States while singling out aerospace giant Boeing as a prime example. Khan’s remarks, delivered during a speech at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, underscored the pitfalls of allowing unchecked consolidation in key industries.
Khan lambasted her predecessors for permitting a significant wave of consolidation within the aerospace sector, culminating in Boeing emerging as the sole commercial aerospace manufacturer in the country following its merger with McDonnell Douglas in 1997. She argued that this pursuit of national champions, companies deemed too essential to face antitrust enforcement, has resulted in detrimental consequences for both the industry and American competitiveness on the global stage.
The FTC chair pointed to Boeing’s recent struggles as a stark illustration of the dangers posed by monopolization. Citing issues such as lower product quality, shortsighted cost-cutting measures, and undue political influence, Khan painted a grim picture of the ramifications of allowing companies to grow unchecked.
“Boeing effectively became too-big-to-fail and a point of leverage for countries seeking to influence policymaking,” Khan asserted, highlighting Congress’s allocation of a $25 billion line item for Boeing during the COVID-19 crisis as evidence of the company’s privileged status.
While Boeing ultimately opted to raise capital privately through bond issuances in 2020, Khan emphasized the significant role played by Federal Reserve support in facilitating this maneuver.
Khan’s remarks also addressed the broader debate surrounding antitrust enforcement in the technology sector. Contrary to claims that regulation would stifle innovation and cede global leadership to competitors like China, Khan argued that rigorous antitrust enforcement in previous decades had actually paved the way for revolutionary advancements in Silicon Valley. She cautioned against allowing dominant tech firms to prioritize their own interests over those of the nation, particularly in light of their increasing integration into the Chinese market.
As the Biden administration and lawmakers grapple with the implications of unchecked corporate consolidation, Khan’s warnings serve as a stark reminder of the perils of prioritizing national champions at the expense of fair competition and innovation.
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Canadian Government Approves Bunge-Viterra Merger with Conditions
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Sues Elon Musk Over Delayed Disclosure of Twitter Stock Ownership
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
European Commission Orders Lufthansa to Support Condor’s Frankfurt-New York Route
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
No Pause for Big Tech Probes: EU Keeps Pressure on as Trump Arrives
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Faces Roadblocks in India After Antitrust Ruling, Warns of Feature Rollbacks
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand