
The German competition watchdog has announced antitrust investigations against PayPal.
In a statement on Monday (Jan. 23), the Bundeskartellamt (BKartA) said it is probing the payment company over potentially anticompetitive terms in its user agreement applicable in Germany.
Under PayPal’s terms, BKartA said that merchants aren’t allowed to offer their goods and services at lower prices if customers choose to use a payment method that is cheaper than PayPal.
Read more: Germany’s Antitrust Regulator Opens Probe Into PayPal
The global payment firm uses such clauses in many markets as a way to prevent businesses from incentivizing consumers to use alternative payment methods. But in Monday’s statement, Andreas Mundt, president of BKartA, spoke against the practice,
“These clauses might restrict competition and violate the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position,” Mundt said.
The release also pointed to provisions in PayPal’s terms of use that prohibit sellers from expressing a preference for payment methods other than PayPal or from favoring other methods by, for example, making their use more convenient.
“[BKartA] will now assess the extent of PayPal’s market power and in how far online sellers depend on offering PayPal as a payment method,” Mundt said. “If merchants are prevented from taking into account the differences in costs of various payment methods by imposing surcharges or granting discounts, it is more difficult for other and new payment schemes to compete successfully in terms of price and quality or to enter the market in the first place.”
BKartA noted that PayPal is not only the leading online payment scheme in Germany but also one of the most expensive. It adds that PayPal’s standard rate in Germany currently amounts to 2.49%-2.99% of the payment amount plus 34-39 cents per payment.
Featured News
Italy’s Antitrust Regulator Investigates State Railway Operators for Market Abuse
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
Democrats Urge Trump to Reinstate Ousted FTC Commissioners
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
White House-Led Talks Focus on U.S. Investor Takeover of TikTok
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
Oregon Lawmakers Target Algorithmic Price-Fixing in Rental Market
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
New Merger Disclosure Rules Double Review Time, Complicate Deal Process
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li