
Germany’s competition watchdog has launched a probe into Apple’s privacy rules, fearing that the company’s move to clamp down on user-tracking could have anti-competitive effects.
Bundeskartellamt chief Andreas Mundt said Tuesday that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework, which was introduced in April 2021 and establishes preconditions for user-tracking by third-party apps, could be abused to give a leg up to Apple’s own services.
At the heart of the matter are concerns that the US tech giant’s rules obstruct third-party apps from accessing data used for targeted advertising, while not limiting Apple’s ability to obtain that same data.
“A corporation like Apple which is in a position to unilaterally set rules for its ecosystem, in particular for its app store, should make pro-competitive rules,” Mundt said. “We have reason to doubt that this is the case when we see that Apple’s rules apply to third parties, but not to Apple itself.
“This would allow Apple to preference its own offers or impede other companies.” Apple refuted the cartel office’s claims Tuesday and touted the benefits of its privacy-preserving approach.
“ATT does not prevent companies from advertising or restrict their use of the first-party data they obtain from users with their consent,” an Apple spokesperson said. “These rules apply equally to all developers — including Apple — and we have received strong support from regulators and privacy advocates for this feature.”
Germany’s efforts follow scrutiny of Apple’s ATT framework by both the French and Polish competition authorities and are based on new competencies that the Bonn-based regular was given as part of last year’s competition reform for digital markets. An investigation was launched in June last year to determine Apple’s significance for competition across markets as part of the new rules.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Top Australian Law Firms Target ACCC Talent Ahead of Major Merger Reforms
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
What the Google Antitrust Trial Has Revealed So Far
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Hamlin Remains Confident in 23XI, Front Row Antitrust Case Against NASCAR
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Google Faces €2.97 Billion Lawsuit in Italy Over Alleged Market Abuse
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
UFC Finalizes $375 Million Settlement in Fighter Antitrust Case
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece