Some app developers claim Google is pressuring them to embed a code in their products that will expand Google’s access to consumer data and give it an advantage over competitors. The concerns involving Firebase, a software offered for apps, are part of an investigation by state attorneys general and the US Justice Department into whether Google has stifled competition, Reuters reported, citing “two people with knowledge of the investigation.”
Tools on Firebase, which is embedded in apps such as Instacart and Expedia, give Google information on consumers that it can use for targeted ads, Reuters explained.
“It’s about data collection and ad serving,” Bob Lawson, founder and director of mobile software company Kumulos told Reuters. “The more Google knows about users, the more helpful it can be to advertisers.”
Firebase is bundled with Google’s Android Studio, a program to code apps for Google’s Android operating system. Over the last two years, Google has been making it difficult for apps to do even common functions without Firebase tools, sources told Reuters.
Google recently has told app developers that Firebase will “significantly improve” results of their Google ad campaigns, Reuters reported.
Firebase competitors are saying they want to be promoted on Android Studio as well. Android developers “deserve to know that there is a choice,” said Mark Piller, chief executive of a competing software vendor, Backendless.
Firebase tools are optional, can be used with competing services, and can boost revenue for apps, Google told Reuters. With Firebase, app makers don’t have to code basic components or install alternatives that can be more complex, the company stated.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh