Google Loses Bid to Dismiss Lawsuit Accusing it of Monopolizing Digital Advertising
Google faced a setback in a Manhattan federal court as it lost its bid to dismiss a lawsuit filed by digital media advertising company Inform. The lawsuit accuses Google of engaging in monopolistic practices that allegedly led to Inform going out of business.
US District Judge P. Kevin Castel’s ruling on Thursday allowed Inform to proceed with part of its case, stating that the company had plausibly alleged Google’s unlawful monopolization of the online video advertising market, as reported by Reuters. While the decision permits Inform to pursue millions of dollars in alleged damages, it does not grant the company the ability to seek an injunction that could compel Google to change certain business practices.
In response to the ruling, Google issued a statement asserting that Castel had “significantly narrowed the case,” aligning with previous decisions to dismiss similar claims in other instances. The company emphasized its intention to continue challenging what it referred to as “meritless allegations.”
Related: Antitrust Suit Against Google Returns To Texas
This is not the first legal battle Google has faced regarding its dominance in the digital advertising arena. Earlier in March, Castel ruled that advertisers could proceed with a proposed class action lawsuit alleging that Google illegally controls the ad exchange market. However, he also narrowed the scope of that case, according to Reuters.
Google has consistently maintained its stance, arguing that adopting new technology is a natural part of a competitive market and does not constitute anticompetitive behavior. In a court filing last year, Google contended that Inform’s lawsuit failed to demonstrate any anticompetitive conduct or how it contributed to the demise of the company.
The tech giant is grappling with additional legal challenges related to its alleged abuse of power in the digital ads market. Notably, the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Google in Alexandria, Virginia federal court last year, while Texas is leading another related case in the state’s Eastern District federal court.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
DirecTV Urges Second Circuit to Revive Antitrust Lawsuit Against Nexstar
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Omnicom and Interpublic Unite in $13.25B Deal: Big Tech Competition Heats Up
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Ruling Highlights DOJ’s Push Against Algorithmic Collusion in Antitrust Cases
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Judge’s Decision on Kroger-Albertsons Merger Expected Soon
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Urged to Resolve Legal Standoff Over Amazon and Flipkart Investigation
Dec 9, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead