
On Tuesday, a federal judge in California sanctioned Google for not preserving chat records that were important to a number of lawsuits. These lawsuits accused the company of abusing its market power in-app sales. Despite a court order, Google failed to maintain its internal communication records, The Standard reported.
Judge James Donato of the US District Court for the Northern District of California sided with the plaintiffs in the suits and ordered Google to pay the attorney fees and other costs they incurred as a result of its actions.
The judge has not ruled out the option of imposing additional penalties on Google once all parties have completed their evidence collection.
Read more: DOJ Says Google ‘Intentionally Destroyed’ Chat Logs In Antitrust Suit
At the same time, Donato declined to issue terminating sanctions, which would have decided the case against Google based on its failure to preserve the chats.
The penalty was issued shortly after the plaintiffs claimed to have discovered a culture of concealment throughout the tech giant, implicating CEO Sundar Pichai in the deletion of evidence.
“Overall, the record demonstrates that Google employees who received a litigation hold in this case were unable or unwilling to follow the Chat preservation instructions, and sometimes disregarded the instructions altogether,” Donato wrote.
The judge’s ruling pertains to four antitrust cases where Google is accused of violating antitrust laws by using its market position in the Google Play Store to charge excessive commissions. The cases involve two tech companies, attorneys general of 37 states and the District of Columbia, and millions of individuals.
Featured News
Top Australian Law Firms Target ACCC Talent Ahead of Major Merger Reforms
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
What the Google Antitrust Trial Has Revealed So Far
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Hamlin Remains Confident in 23XI, Front Row Antitrust Case Against NASCAR
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Google Faces €2.97 Billion Lawsuit in Italy Over Alleged Market Abuse
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
UFC Finalizes $375 Million Settlement in Fighter Antitrust Case
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece