Alphabet’s Google has presented a new argument in front of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday, urging the court to prevent Texas and other states from relocating their antitrust case against the tech giant from New York to Texas. Google cautioned that such a move could disrupt related litigation concerning the company’s digital advertising practices.
The dispute revolves around a court order allowing Texas to transfer its antitrust case back to its home state, where it initially sued Google in 2020, according to a report by Reuters. This appeal marks the first test of a new federal law enacted in December 2022, allowing state attorneys general to select their preferred venue for antitrust lawsuits.
In their lawsuit, Texas and a coalition of other states accused Google of wielding its dominance in online searches over the digital advertising market. If successful, the suit could result in damages and a potential mandate for Google to divest some of its assets. Google has consistently labeled the lawsuit as “meritless”.
Related: DOJ Opposes Google’s Attempt To Move Ad Antitrust Case To New York
The case was incorporated into multidistrict litigation in Manhattan in 2021, where a U.S. judge is currently reviewing lawsuits from various other plaintiffs, including advertisers and publishers. In a significant development, the federal Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, responsible for handling venue disputes, ruled in August that Texas could withdraw from the consolidated New York litigation.
During Tuesday’s hearing, members of the three-judge 2nd Circuit panel expressed skepticism regarding Google’s plea for Texas to remain in New York. Circuit Judge Richard Wesley posed a critical question to Google’s attorney, Jessica Ellsworth, saying, “Would you identify for me how sending the case back to Texas increases your liability or imposes new duties on you? Because your brief says nothing about it.”
Source
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI