The European Union’s privacy body has voiced skepticism over the acquisition of Fitbit by Google, claiming it could lead to privacy risks, Reuters reported. The deal was announced last November, with Google angling to compete with rivals Apple and Samsung in terms of a crowded market of fitness trackers and smartwatches.
According to the EU, among others, the merger has the potential to endanger people’s privacy. The consumption of Fitbit by Google would give the Big Tech firm access to a wide range of health documents, with the EU claiming that this acquisition could lead to a “high level of risk” for European people’s sensitive information.
European Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager will vet the deal. In November, she voiced concern over the merger, and about Big Tech firms targeting rivals that amass troves of such data from users.
The EU hopes that Google would exercise the proper level of restraint and precaution in terms of data, and assess data privacy requirements — as well as mitigate any possible privacy and data risks — before going forward for an antitrust approval with the EU. Google stated it would never sell people’s personal information and would not use data from Fitbit to sell ads. Fitbit users would also have the option to review and delete their data if they chose to do so.
Google stated it would make sure to work with regulators on any potential concerns.
The acquisition bid for Fitbit has been a contentious one for Google thus far, as it has battled numerous instances of red tape and regulatory concerns from multiple parties. The acquisition is worth US$2.1 billion for Google, and the entrance into the health market for parent company Alphabet has seemed worth the cost.
However, both the US Department of Justice and the EU have been looking into the antitrust concerns.
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand