
By: Kate Walsh and Ken Libby (FTC)
The FTC welcomes comments on its recent HSR Rulemaking initiative, and to facilitate a robust and thoughtful set of public comments, the Commission is holding a series of three live virtual workshops in November to answer the public’s questions before comments are due.
On September 21, the Commission announced that it would seek public comments on proposed changes to the rules and interpretations that implement the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. This rulemaking initiative has two parts. The first is a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would, if adopted, make two changes to the existing rules. The first proposed change would require filers to disclose additional information about their associates and to aggregate acquisitions in the same issuer across those entities. The second change is a new proposed rule that would exempt the acquisition of 10 percent or less of an issuer’s voting securities unless the acquiring person already has a competitively significant relationship with the issuer.
The second part of this rulemaking initiative is designed to encourage a broad conversation about changes in corporate structure and investment activity since the late 1970s and whether those changes warrant modifications in HSR rules or interpretations. What was right for 1979 when the premerger notification program began may not be right for 2020, and we want to ensure that HSR rules and interpretations keep pace with new developments so that the antitrust agencies get notice of potentially problematic deals before they occur. The Advance Notice of Public Rulemaking (ANPRM) seeks to gather information on seven topics that will help determine the path for potential future amendments to the HSR rules and interpretations of those rules. These seven topic areas were identified based on our experience with reviewing thousands of filings every year, and answering questions about HSR filing obligations—and enforcing the rules when necessary to ensure HSR compliance…
Featured News
China Summons Delivery Giants Over Unfair Competition Concerns
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Orders Sanctions Against Missouri for Noncompliance in Price-Fixing Probe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Confusion Reigns In AI Policy In US and Europe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
EU Clears ADNOC’s $16.3 Billion Acquisition of Covestro
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Antitrust Chief Says BBVA-Sabadell Merger Won’t Stifle Competition
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece