A PYMNTS Company

Greece: P&G played dirty in diaper sales, says Competition Commission

By  |  June 25, 2013

According to a press release from the Hellenic Competition Commission, Greece will hear a case regarding allegations that Proctor & Gamble abused its dominant position in the baby diapers and care products market in the nation. The regulator announced it would head the arguments in the early part of this September as a result of issuing a statement of objections to the company, which accuses P&G of colluding to exclude competitors from the baby products market – those collusions, according to the HCC, included mixed bundling rebates and “rebates conditional upon the commitment of excessive shelf space for its products,” in addition to other practices in violation of Greece’s competition laws. Read the full press release below.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Athens, 20 July 2013
    PRESS RELEASE

    Investigation into alleged infringements of Articles 1 and 2 of Law 703/77, as well as Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, by Procter & Gamble (P&G) in the retail market for baby diapers in Greece

    Following the issuing of a statement of objections, the Hellenic Competition Commission will convene in the beginning of September and hear a case of alleged infringements of Articles 1 and 2 of Law 703/77 and of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (in particular, abuse of a dominant position) in connection with commercial practices employed by P&G with regard to baby diapers and related baby care products in Greece.

    According to the statement of objections, P&G has adopted and implemented during the investigated period 2003 – 2011 abusive practices aimed at maintaining and/or strengthening its dominant position in the market for baby diapers, thereby excluding competitors and limiting their growth possibilities. The alleged abusive conduct included, inter alia, individualized target rebates, mixed bundling rebates, rebates conditional upon the commitment of excessive shelf space for its products, as well as the imposition of unfair trading conditions.

    The issuing of a statement of objections does not prejudge the existence of an infringement. The Hellenic Competition Commission will decide upon the case, taking into account all relevant facts and after hearing all implicated parties.

     

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.