Guilty plea count up to 22 in DOJ bid-rigging probe into CA real estate auctions
California real estate investors Lydia Fong and Matthew Worthing have pleaded guilty to bid-rigging at public real estate foreclosure auctions in northern California. From October 2009 to January 2011, Fong and Worthing, along with co-conspirators, selected a winning bidder ahead of time and agreed not to compete with each other. The result was to obtain real estate in San Mateo and San Francisco at non-competitive prices. Fong and Worthing mark the 21st and 22nd individuals who have pleaded guilty to fraud related to public real estate foreclosure auctions in northern California. The DOJ’s investigation is ongoing.
Full content: DOJ Press Release
Related content: Design and Implementation of Screens and Their Use by Defendants (Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Global Economics Group, NYU Stern School of Business)
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI