How should we evaluate a competition authority’s performance? Rejecting purely quantitative scoring models, this article argues that numbers tell only partial, and often misleading, stories—high case counts may signal robust enforcement or systemic failure; judicial annulments may reflect poor reasoning or, alternatively, a healthy system of checks and balances. The author proposed alternative centers on narrative, justification, and good-governance metrics, emphasizing preventive enforcemen
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 216.73.216.14
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!