The International Competition Network (ICN), the global body that brings together competition regulators from all over the world, has suspended Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS) from participating in all its upcoming events, as announced in a statement.
This move comes after antitrust authorities in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and the Netherlands urged it to take action following the country’s invasion of Ukraine, replicating calls from various other industry associations and individuals.
Related: Baltic Regulators & Ukrainian Scholars Call for Russian Exclusion From ICN
The ICN’s activities are voluntary and rely on a high degree of goodwill and cooperation among members. ICN Members are in continuous contact, working together to improve competition policy and cooperation between authorities. Members of the network regularly meet to develop common standards and exchange views.
Based on Section 3.4 iv (e) of the ICN’s Operational Framework, the Chair is responsible for the “general conduct of the affairs of the ICN where not otherwise specified to be within the responsibility of any Group or Committee.” In light of the current events in Ukraine and their impact on collaboration between ICN members, the Chair made the determination that conditions were not suitable for the cooperation and good relations required.
Russia’s war against Ukraine has greatly increased tensions in Europe and across the world. Among several factors leading up to the war is the controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline that takes Russian gas to Germany, bypassing the Ukraine. Germany had threatened to stop Nord Stream 2 if Russia invaded, although this has not yet happened after nearly one week of combat between Russian and Ukrainian forces.
The ICN Chair, at the request of Steering Group members and other ICN members, has reviewed FAS Russia’s participation in the network. After consultation with the members of the Steering Group the Chair decided to suspend the FAS’ participation in ICN activities.
The ICN’s move has already been backed by important members, including the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). The ICN has said that, should the situation in Ukraine change, they are willing to revise their position on the matter.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh