After committing US$5 billion to investments in India, Amazon reportedly wants to increase its investment by US$2 billion. With the additional capital, the eCommerce retailer could better compete with Walmart in India, CNBC reported.
“Amazon has had its eyes and ears firmly on the ground and has been carefully planning its strategy,” an unnamed source told CNBC affiliate CNBC TV-18. “India is one of its fastest-growing geographies, and Amazon will not be left behind.”
Citi Research projected Amazon’s market in India could be worth US$16 billion. And with Walmart’s acquisition of Flipkart, “Flipkart’s ability to increase market share and India presence will increase,” the source told CNBC TV-18.
The news comes as Amazon reportedly made a formal offer to acquire a majority stake in Flipkart as a counter to Walmart’s interest in the Indian eCommerce retailer. According to sources, Amazon wanted to buy 60% of Flipkart, CNBC reported. Amazon’s offer was said to have likely matched Walmart’s. According to reports earlier last year, Walmart was considering investing US$10 billion to US$12 billion for such a deal. Even so, Amazon reportedly offered Flipkart a breakup fee of US$2 billion. The company also reportedly sought a non-compete agreement from Flipkart’s founders.
But the race to win Flipkart is over—won by Walmart with a US$15 billion bid on the firm. The deal gave Walmart a majority stake in the firm, roughly 75% of the entire Flipkart group. The final outcome came as a surprise to many, such as Kashyap Deorah, internet entrepreneur and author of “The Golden Tap.”
“I would not have bet on a deal converging between Walmart and Flipkart, primarily because of the culture difference,” Deorah told The Wall Street Journal. “Walmart is an extensively positive margin-driven culture, and Flipkart has consistently been a gross margin negative business.”
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
University of Kentucky Eyes Structural Shift Amid Antitrust Pressures
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Opt-Out Flops Out At WIPO Meeting on AI and IP
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Watchdog Fines Pharma Giants Over Anti-Competitive Practices in Pharmacies
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
X Sues Minnesota Over Law Banning AI Deepfakes in Elections
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Twelve States Sue Trump Over Tariff Policy, Citing Overreach of Executive Power
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece