The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has today submitted to the Madras High Court that it would not enforce the penalty of Rs 420 crore it has imposed on Hyundai Motor India Ltd (HMIL), for anti-competitive practices in the sale of its spare parts through authorised dealers alone, as the Court has earlier asked the competition watchdog not to issue final order.
HMIL has earlier filed a petition seeking the Court to stay the CCI’s order, as it is against the Court’s direction in April 13, 2015, to continue the enquiry and the final orders shall not be passed.
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, G Rajagopalan, additional solicitor genral of India, submitted that there was a miscommunication, which resulted in CCI pronouncing the order even though the Court has asked it not to pass final order. He added that the authority will not enforce its order till the final order is passed by the Court on the matter.
Full content: The Hindu Business Line
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI