
Zomato, an India-based food delivery startup, is reportedly being investigated by regulators for its purchase of UberEats India, which could be seen as violating the nation’s anti-competitive rules, sources told MoneyControl.com.
In March, as reported on PYMNTS, Uber sold its food delivery operation in India to Zomato for US$206 million, according to a regulatory filing by the ridesharing firm. The report also noted Zomato’s biggest competitor is Swiggy, known as India’s No. 1 food delivery business, per industry estimates.
The news service reported that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is looking at two aspects of the deal to see if the acquisition will lead to less competition and whether the two companies should have notified regulators about the transaction.
A Zomato spokesman confirmed to the news service that CCI contacted the food delivery company and the regulator’s questions concerned basic information and clarifications about the transaction.
“We believe this is customary to any merger and acquisition transaction in India,” the spokesperson said. “We have received similar information requests in the past on other transactions we have undertaken. We have responded to CCI accordingly.”
The transaction net Uber US$154 million, which it has reported as other income, according to filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
If the CCI concludes the companies should have given it a heads-up about a merger, it can impose a penalty from 1% of the total deal or its assets, whichever is higher, the report said.
Uber Eats India had revenues of US$20 million and reported a loss of US$61 million for the three months ending on September 30, Uber said in a filing with the SEC.
One of MoneyControl’s sources said the purchase of UberEats India is not a simple sale because the deal included Uber buying a stake in Zomato.
“It is a very complex deal,” said the source, who is aware of competition laws and the CCI probe.
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
University of Kentucky Eyes Structural Shift Amid Antitrust Pressures
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Opt-Out Flops Out At WIPO Meeting on AI and IP
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Watchdog Fines Pharma Giants Over Anti-Competitive Practices in Pharmacies
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
X Sues Minnesota Over Law Banning AI Deepfakes in Elections
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Twelve States Sue Trump Over Tariff Policy, Citing Overreach of Executive Power
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece