In a dramatic escalation of tensions between Indian startups and tech giant Alphabet Google, a group representing Indian startups has formally petitioned the country’s antitrust watchdog to intervene in the recent removal of over 100 Indian apps from the Google Play Store. The move comes as a response to Google’s enforcement of its policy requiring apps to pay a service fee for in-app purchases made through platforms other than Google’s.
According to a letter seen by Reuters, the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF) has urged the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to order Google to reinstate the removed apps, citing concerns of anti-competitive behavior. Google’s action, described by ADIF as a “brazen move,” has sparked fears of irreparable damage to the Indian market.
The dispute stems from Google’s decision on Friday to remove a slew of Indian apps, including popular ones offered by Matrimony.com, for non-compliance with its policy on in-app payments. This move has drawn the ire of Indian startups, which have long accused Google of monopolistic practices. The startups argue that Google’s policy violates a 2022 antitrust directive aimed at preventing the tech giant from taking punitive measures against companies that utilize alternate billing systems.
Read more: Google Accuses India’s Competition Commission of Protecting Amazon
In its letter to the CCI dated March 1, ADIF asserted that Google’s actions were not only anti-competitive but also detrimental to the entire market. The letter, though not public, emphasized the urgency of the situation and called for swift action to address what it perceives as an unjustifiable assault on the Indian app ecosystem.
Google, for its part, has staunchly defended its policies, arguing that its in-app fee is crucial for the development and promotion of the Android and Play Store ecosystem. The company insists that it is in compliance with relevant regulations and denies any wrongdoing.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI