Importers of garlic and various government officials in Indonesia are denying accusations they colluded to form a cartel and inflate garlic prices, say reports. In the second hearing of the case, launched by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission, the Trade Ministry denied the cartel claims and further said its officials are not subject to the nation’s competition law. The KPPU is using the 1999 Monopoly and Unfair Competition Law to bring the case against the accused. But in the Trade Ministry’s testimony, law bureau chief Lasminingsih said the KPPY does not have the authority to name the government” as defendants in the case. The first hearing of the matter was held last month.
Full Content: Fresh Plaza
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI