Posted by Social Science Research Network
Innovation, Litigation, and New Drugs Ramsi Woodcock (Georgia State University)
Abstract: The study of patent settlements that specify the date at which a challenger may bring a competing product to market (“entry settlements”) has not taken innovation into account. I adapt the standard optimal patent life model to account for innovation in considering the effect of entry settlements on consumer value. I determine the maximum strengthening of a patent through settlement that does not harm consumers, calibrate it with drug market data, and conclude that, for patents weaker than 80.3%, drug patent strengthening of more than 42.5 percentage points, or any agreement to enter at patent expiry, harms consumers.
Featured News
Antitrust Lawsuit Over Google’s Search Monopoly Proceeds in CA Court
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Digital Markets Act at Two Years: Enforcement in a Shifting Political Climate
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
EU Expands Tech Oversight with Updated Anti-Hate Speech Code
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Cargill Settles Turkey Price-Fixing Lawsuit for $32.5 Million
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Raises Concerns Over $2.8 Billion NCAA Settlement
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand