Government representatives and opposition leaders clashed Wednesday during a hearing in the High Court over the legality of a controversial deal on Israel’s newly found gas fields in the Mediterranean.
In an unprecedented move, the state requested Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu be allowed to personally present a defense of the agreement after the court ordered a substantive debate over the policy.
The court said Netanyahu would need to present a written statement within two days, and would be allowed to testify in a hearing soon after. Netanyahu was initially reported to be heading to the court in person on Wednesday to testify.
After months of intense debate and numerous bureaucratic and legislative hurdles, Netanyahu signed the controversial gas outline on December 17 but still faces opposition from opposition lawmakers and activists who claim the terms of the deal create a monopoly in the gas market and will lead to higher prices for Israeli consumers.
Five separate petitions have been filed with the High Court urging it to throw out the deal over a range of legal issues.
Netanyahu was able to sign the deal after invoking a never-before-used clause to override an antitrust ruling against the deal by declaring it an issue of national security.
Netanyahu was forced to pursue the use of “Clause 52” after then-antitrust commissioner David Gilo ruled that the Israeli-American Delek-Noble conglomerate that is developing the Leviathan gas field may constitute a monopoly, sparking a vociferous national debate on the terms given to the energy companies.
Former economy minister Aryeh Deri, not wanting to pay a political price for the gas deal but also not wanting to stand in its way, resigned his post last month, allowing Netanyahu to take over the ministry and sign the deal himself.
Full content: The Jerusalem Post
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DirecTV and Disney Resolve Dispute, Restore Programming for Subscribers
Sep 15, 2024 by
CPI
UK Antitrust Authority Raises Concerns Over Vodafone-Three Merger
Sep 15, 2024 by
CPI
Brazilian Supreme Court Lifts Freeze on Starlink Accounts, Transfers $3.3 Million to National Treasury
Sep 15, 2024 by
CPI
Steptoe Expands Antitrust Practice with Key London Hire
Sep 15, 2024 by
CPI
Instant Ad Auctions at the Heart of Google’s Federal Monopoly Case
Sep 15, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández