Italy’s antitrust agency, AGCM, has slapped fines totaling over 15.6 million euros ($16.3 million) on six major energy providers, including industry giants Eni’s Plenitude and Enel. The penalties were levied for violating regulations by implementing price hikes during a period when the government had explicitly prohibited such unilateral actions.
According to Reuters, the illicit billing occurred between August 2022 and June 2023, a time frame coinciding with the government’s ban on unilateral price increases for gas and electricity supplies. AGCM, in a statement released on Wednesday, highlighted the defiance of these energy providers in the face of the regulatory directive.
Enel, one of Italy’s largest energy companies, was slapped with the maximum fine of 10 million euros. Eni’s Plenitude, another major player in the sector, received a penalty of 5 million euros. The charges relate to the companies raising prices for over 4 million customers without providing any advance warning, a clear violation of the government-imposed regulations.
Read more: CONTROLLING MERGERS AND MARKET POWER: A Program for Reviving Antitrust in America
Responding to the fines, Enel defended its actions, stating that it had adhered to the ban by merely renewing expiring economic conditions and not making any unilateral variations to the contract. The company asserted its commitment to full compliance and reserved the right to take measures to demonstrate its adherence to regulations.
Eni’s Plenitude also maintained its innocence and expressed the intention to appeal against the decision, affirming that it had acted correctly within the regulatory framework.
In addition to the industry giants, regional utilities Acea and Dolomiti Energia faced fines of 560,000 euros and 50,000 euros, respectively, for failing to provide customers with sufficient advance notice of impending price increases.
Iberdrola’s Italian unit received a 25,000 euro fine for reportedly resorting to coercive tactics. According to AGCM, the company threatened to cut off customers unless they accepted a new contract under “worse economic conditions.”
The antitrust agency’s decision sends a strong message regarding the enforcement of fair practices within the energy sector.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI