
On Tuesday, Italy’s antitrust authority announced an investigation into the Chinese-owned app TikTok for allegedly violating its rules. The main reason for this investigation is due to the possible publication of dangerous content which could incite suicide, self-harm and poor nutrition.
The Italian watchdog is evaluating the activities of TikTok’s Ireland, UK and Italian units. To this point, Italy’s tax police have visited TikTok’s Italian headquarters. A statement released by the watchdog reveals further details regarding their investigation.
TikTok, owned by Chinese company ByteDance, denied wrongdoing and said it would cooperate with the investigation.
Read more: UK Bans TikTok Over Security Concerns
Organizations worldwide are tightening up regulations as international worries increase at the possibility of China accessing customers’ contact and location information. This is a legitimate concern for our company and the industry as a whole. We take privacy seriously and are continually examining our security protocols to ensure that user data remains safe.
According to the watchdog “adequate systems to supervise the content published by third parties are lacking” and the app violates TikTok’s guidelines which provide for the removal of dangerous content.
The antitrust body also takes issue with the exploitation of artificial intelligence techniques capable of “causing undue conditioning” of TikTok’s users.
Featured News
Australia’s Major Supermarkets Face Scrutiny Over Profit Margins Amid Rising Prices
Mar 21, 2025 by
CPI
Fired FTC Commissioners Warn of Potential White House Influence Over Mergers
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Dr. Matthew Backus Joins Compass Lexecon as an Affiliate
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li