Amazon Japan will do away with a contract clause that has required e-book and other suppliers to guarantee prices lower than those offered on rival e-commerce sites, in response to an antitrust probe that began last year.
Normally, the prices at which suppliers sell their products online should differ depending on contract period, discounts and other factors. However, Amazon has used its dominant market position to make suppliers guarantee prices and lineups comparable to what is available on competing e-commerce sites — via the so-called most-favored nation clause.
Now the online retail giant will remove the clause from contracts with publishers providing e-book content and sellers of beauty products, stationery, appliances on its marketplace, among others — according to a source familiar with the matter.
The Japan Fair Trade Commission launched an investigation into Amazon Japan last August on the suspicion that the unfair contract terms were eroding competition. The commission could have declared that Amazon was in violation of antitrust rules, if it judged that suppliers and consumers were being deprived of other e-commerce options. That prospect has forced the company to give in.
Full Content: Asia Nikkei
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Awarded $271.2M in Damages Against Amgen
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chair Proposes 15% Staff Reduction Amid Budget Constraints
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Urges Antitrust Watchdog to Prioritize Growth and Clarity in Business Regulation
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Athletes File New Objections to NCAA’s $2.8 Billion Settlement Proposal
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
TikTok Charged by EU Over Alleged Breach of Digital Services Act
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas