A PYMNTS Company

JD Sports Calls UK Watchdog’s Decision “Absurd”

By  |  May 10, 2020

JD Sports Fashion has criticized the UK’s competition watchdog for paving the way for potential job losses after the retailer was blocked from merging with a struggling rival, Footasylum.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Peter Cowgill, the executive chairman of the UK’s largest sports retailer, said the company “fundamentally disagreed” with the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) decision, which was “absurd” in the light of the high street’s struggles.

    JD, which owns a string of sports and outdoor-wear chains including Blacks, Go Outdoors, Millets, and Spain’s Sprinter, as well as JD Sports, stated it was considering whether to appeal against the ruling, which will require it to sell off Footasylum just over a year after acquiring the chain for £90 million (US$111.68 million).

    JD stated Footasylum may have disappeared from the high street without its financial backing, and any new owner would probably cut jobs at the struggling chain.

    Cowgill said, “We fundamentally disagree with the CMA’s decision, which continues to rely on an inaccurate and outdated analysis of the UK sports retail competitive landscape, and is underpinned by outdated and flawed customer surveys.”

    Full Content: The Guardian

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.