A PYMNTS Company

Judge Denies Class Status in Antitrust Case Against Meta

By  |  January 27, 2025

Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, has successfully avoided a major legal challenge after a federal judge ruled against granting class-action status to plaintiffs accusing the company of monopolizing the social media market. According to Bloomberg, the plaintiffs argued that Meta had deceptively used their personal data to dominate personal social networking services.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In a decision issued on January 24, Judge James Donato of the US District Court for the Northern District of California found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate antitrust injury, a critical element for pursuing their case. Additionally, the court excluded the testimony of Nicholas Economides, an economist who served as the plaintiffs’ expert witness.

    Read more: Meta Faces Fresh Allegations of EU Law Breaches in Subscription Service Rollout

    The lawsuit, which dates back to 2020, is one of several legal battles Meta has faced in recent years over alleged antitrust violations. Per Bloomberg, these cases have involved both private plaintiffs and federal regulators, reflecting heightened scrutiny of Meta’s market practices since its rebranding from Facebook.

    Despite the setback for the plaintiffs, the broader legal and regulatory focus on Meta and other tech giants continues. Antitrust suits have become increasingly common as lawmakers and private entities seek to address concerns over the concentration of power in the tech industry.

    Source: Bloomberg