Papa John’s has been the main target of a recent legal dispute surrounding its agreements that restrict its franchisers from poaching employees from each other.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Beaton declined to preliminarily approve the proposed $5 million settlement. However, the opposing sides were given 30 days to resubmit a proposed settlement or file a status report.
Employees sued Papa John’s in 2018 over accusations that the company had unlawfully restricted employee mobility, reported Reuters. These same no-poach agreements were also the main target of a U.S. Appeals Court this month, which stated that McDonald’s must face claims that their franchise agreements unlawfully restricted worker hiring.
Commenting on the case, Dean Harvey, lawyer from Lieff Cabraser Heiman & Bernstein argues that “The plaintiff’s position is that agreements here are unlawful per se. But that’s not entirely obvious.” The lawsuit filed back in 2018 was in representation of 401,000 Papa John’s employees who were part of a prospective class. Lawyers for the proposed class have called the deal “fair and reasonable”.
Judge Beaton also made inquiries into the position put forward by the sole named plaintiff – a manager – regarding its representativeness of the class interests and how the lawyers would prove that the no-poach agreement violates U.S. antitrust laws. Although Papa John’s denies any wrongdoing, they are also reportedly motivated by the “array of risks” and the “uncertainties” of the case.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI