The Justice Department’s misconduct office has found that antitrust prosecutors didn’t violate any rules or regulations by undertaking in-depth reviews of 10 mergers in the cannabis industry at the request of Attorney General William Barr.
In a June 11 memo, the Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) — which investigates allegations of misconduct by employees — said two anonymous whistleblowers alleged that the antitrust division undertook pretextual reviews of the marijuana deals even though they presented no competitive concerns.
Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, OPR’s director and chief counsel, said his office reviewed the whistleblower complaints, as well as documents and information provided by the antitrust division.
“The cannabis industry provided a unique challenge to federal and state regulators alike, and it was reasonable for ATR to seek additional information from the industry through its Second Request process,” Ragsdale wrote in the memo, a copy of which was obtained by POLITICO.
Antitrust prosecutors issue a “second request” for additional information and documents when they have concerns about the potential impact of a merger. These in-depth reviews can lengthen the process by months or years.
John W. Elias, one of the whistleblowers, told members of Congress on Wednesday, June 24, that he raised concerns about the cannabis mergers because they were “not even close” to meeting criteria for an investigation.
Elias testified that Barr ordered antitrust division prosecutors to do an in-depth probe of a US$682 million merger between the marijuana companies MedMen and PharmaCann on March 12, 2019. The division later also opened lengthy investigations into nine other marijuana deals, which required the companies to produce millions of documents.
“Personal dislike of an industry is not a valid basis to ground an antitrust investigation,” said Elias, who served as chief of staff for the antitrust division from 2017 through 2018.
Full Content: Politico
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI