Customer Douglas J. Reece filed a class action lawsuit against JUUL and Altria on April 7 alleging that anticompetitive agreements between the two companies caused consumers to pay more for e-cigarettes. He claims the defendants restrained competition and violated federal antitrust laws. The suit comes days after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) opened a similar investigation.
Altria allegedly purchased a 35% stake in JUUL shortly after announcing they were going to stop selling e-cigarettes in 2018. JUUL quickly rose to the top of the e-cigarette market with revenues growing 700% in 2017. Altria and JUUL entered their agreement in December of 2018 with Altria giving JUUL US$12.8 billion.
“Altria’s investment in JUUL and its exit from the market not only eliminated its existing e-cigarette product but also, through the Non-Compete, halted its ongoing innovation efforts toward developing a new and improved portfolio of products. Thus, consumers lost the benefit of current and future head-to-head competition between Altria and JUUL, and between Altria and other competitors,” the complaint states.
The plaintiff alleges JUUL and Altria’s actions deprived him and the rest of the class of the benefits of competition that antitrust laws are designed to protect. Reece is represented by Salim-Beasley. He is seeking damages for himself and the class, as well as injunctive relief through returning competition to the e-cigarette business. He claims the agreement was not beneficial, citing changes to the agreement in early 2020. “Defendants cannot show the transaction restricting competition resulted in cognizable efficiencies sufficient to outweigh the competitive harm caused by Altria’s agreement to exit the relevant market. Nor can Defendants point to pro-competitive benefits that could not have been achieved through less restrictive means,” Reece alleges.
The Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint against JUUL Labs and Altria Group on April 1, 2020, investigating the same issue.
Full Content: Chicago Tribune
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
X May Be Excluded from EU’s Strict Tech Rules, Sources Suggest
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
G7 Targets Competitive Imbalances in Semiconductor Industry
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh