Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Orders Samsung to Rectify Business Interference Practices

South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) has issued a mandate to Samsung Electronics instructing corrective measures amid accusations of meddling with the operations of its authorized retail stores. The directive comes in response to alleged coercive tactics employed by Samsung, spanning from January 2017 to September 2023, as unveiled by the KFTC.
The antitrust regulator contends that Samsung compelled retailers to divulge their pricing details to the company, wielding a significant impact on the landscape of retail transactions. Specifically, Samsung mandated sellers to input their selling prices into its system, amassing retail price information encompassing a vast array of products, from refrigerators to washing machines. The scope of this data collection extended to 15,389 products and involved 159 agents nationwide as of 2020, amplifying concerns over market transparency and fair competition.
According to the KFTC, Samsung utilized this data to assess the performance of its agents, thereby determining incentives and rewards. However, following the initiation of an investigation by the regulatory body, Samsung discontinued these practices in October 2023.
The KFTC’s scrutiny revealed a breach of the country’s fairness of franchise transactions act, wherein the practice of coercing price disclosures was deemed tantamount to interference in business operations.
An official from the KFTC emphasized the confidentiality of sales margin information, stressing its critical role in shaping contractual agreements between parties. “Such a practice constitutes an interference of business operations that violates the country’s fairness of franchise transactions act,” the official remarked. “Information on sales margins is deemed confidential as it could affect contract terms and conditions between the two sides,” he further added.
Source: Korea Joongang Daily
Featured News
French Prosecutors Open Investigation into X’s Algorithmic Bias
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Urges US Appeals Court to Uphold $725 Million Privacy Settlement
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
UnitedHealth Group Withdraws Motion to Dismiss Antitrust Challenge
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Firms Raise Alarm Over Ex-Amazon Exec Leading UK Competition Regulator
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
US Consumers File Lawsuit to Block Nippon Steel’s Acquisition of US Steel
Feb 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon