Kroger has requested the dismissal of a consumer antitrust lawsuit in the United States regarding their acquisition of competitor retailer Albertsons Companies.
A consumer lawsuit filed document obtained by Reuters claims that the proposed acquisition would lead to higher prices and less competition in the grocery market.
Kroger has responded to the accusations by stating they are “speculative”.
Documents presented by the company’s legal team in California’s federal court have noted that the grocery store customers have not presented a distinct and applicable market that is necessary for evaluating competition within the grocery store industry.
Read more: Kroger Albertsons Merger Will Hurt Farmers
As part of the regulatory review process for the proposed merger, Kroger has stated that they anticipate divesting several stores.
The lawyers stated that the customers have not provided evidence on how the $24.6bn merger would negatively impact them.
The attorneys representing Kroger noted that the lawsuit lacks factual basis.
Addressing US District Judge Vince Chhabria, Kroger lawyers said: “US competition law does not turn every grocery store consumer in the country into a roving antitrust enforcer.”
The associated case hearing is scheduled to take place on 18 May. In October 2022, the two retail giants announced the signing of an initial definitive merger agreement.
The $24.6bn deal is now subject to necessary regulatory clearances, HSR clearance and related customary closing conditions.
Featured News
Pork Industry Faces Legal Challenges as Antitrust Lawsuits Against Seaboard Foods Dismissed
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Strengthens Investigation with Advisory Panel of Veterinary Experts
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
US Merchants Sue Visa, Alleging Unfair Dominance in Debit Card Market
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Appoints New Chief Competition Economist
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
EU Commission Requests Information from YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok on Algorithm Usage
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh