The Competition Commission has reached a settlement with Lafarge Industries South Africa that resolves charges of cartelization. The Commission found that Lafarge–with South Africa’s other main cement producers Pretoria Portland Cement Company, AfriSam, and Natal Portland Cement Cimpor–colluded to fix prices and allocate the cement market. Sales information was submitted to the Cement and Concrete Institute to maintain agreed-upon prices. Lafarge’s involvement in the cartel dated from 1996. The company has agreed to the settlement fine of R 148,724,400, which constitutes 6 percent of its 2010 annual turnover in the Southern African Customs Union region.
A R 124,878,870 settlement has already been reached with AfriSam. The Commission will focus on the case against NPC-Cimpor next.
Full content: Mail & Guardian
Related content: South African Competition Policy in 2008: Key Priorities of the Competition Commission (Simon Roberts, Competition Commission of South Africa)
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li