A PYMNTS Company

Latest Constitutional Challenge To Section 232 Duties

 |  June 1, 2020

By Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Beginning in March 2018, President Trump issued
    proclamations imposing duties on steel and aluminum imports into the United
    States.  In response, one company filed a complaint last week alleging
    that the administration of these duties is unconstitutional.  Thyssenkrupp
    Materials, NA, Inc. and several of its related operating divisions, filed a
    complaint with the Court of International Trade (CIT) last week seeking to
    challenge the Section 232 duties.

    The complaint alleges improper administration of the exclusion request process.  The Presidential Proclamations imposing the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports indicated that the Department of Commerce be permitted to “exclude from any adopted import restrictions” certain steel and aluminum “articles.”   However, the final rules promulgated by the Commerce Department approve exclusions only to the “individual or organization that submitted the request” and that “[o]ther individuals or organizations that wish to submit an exclusion request for steel or aluminum product that has already been the subject of an approved exclusion request may request an exclusion under this supplement.”

    CONTINUE READING…