By: Edward Coulson, Benjamin Blacklock & Alexandra Hildyard (Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner)
In July 2016, the European Commission (the Commission) issued a settlement decision, concluding that five prominent truck manufacturers had engaged in a cartel from 1997 to 2011. The cartel involved colluding on the prices of medium and heavy trucks, as well as coordinating the timing and allocation of costs related to emissions technologies.
Among the numerous claimants in the Trucks Cartel case, Royal Mail and BT were the first and only claimants in the UK to proceed to trial. Their claims were heard by the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in London during a ten-week trial held from April to June 2022. In January 2023, the CAT delivered its judgment, decisively ruling in favor of the claimants, Royal Mail and BT.
While DAF has been granted permission to appeal certain aspects of the CAT’s judgment regarding the Supply Pass-on issue (as defined below), it has not sought permission to appeal the CAT’s decision on other mitigation arguments, namely its “Resale Pass-on” and “Complements” arguments (defined below)…
Featured News
Doug Gurr Appointed Interim Chairman of UK’s Competition Authority
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
LinkedIn Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Misuse of Customer Data for AI Training
Jan 22, 2025 by
Amanda Adams
Johns Hopkins and Caltech Settle for $35.3M in College Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Expert Joins Cravath from Paul Weiss
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Chief Removed as UK Government Targets Regulatory Overhaul
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan