Glen Weyl, Alexander White, Jan 30, 2015
Many of the leading controversies in competition policy in the last two decades, especially those surrounding the Microsoft case, reflect the challenges posed by platform industries. Unfortunately, too often economists and policymakers have drawn the wrong lessons when thinking about such industries. Central to our analysis is a more realistic view of the process of consumer coordination. Platforms often use “usage revenue later” strategies to ensure that consumers coordinate on their platform. This greatly mitigates the possibility of inefficient lock-in or excessive dominance by a leading platform, but it makes inefficient fragmentation a greater danger. Thus regulation, rather than competition policy, may be more appropriate in addressing potential market failures arising in platform industries.
Featured News
Newsmax Legal Analysts Push Back on Trump DOJ’s Antitrust Probe of TV Networks
Oct 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Launches In-Depth Antitrust Probe Into XXXLutz’s Takeover of German Furniture Rival Porta
Oct 12, 2026 by
CPI
Starbucks Says It Has No Plans to Buy Chipotle Mexican Grill
Oct 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Urges Antitrust Scrutiny of Kroger’s $1.65 Billion Giant Eagle Deal
Oct 12, 2026 by
CPI
Corcept Seeks to Block Ex-Judge’s Testimony in Teva Antitrust Fight
Oct 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton