
LIV Golf achieved a victory in its antitrust lawsuit against the PGA Tour, which is uncommon.
In a recent ruling by Judge Beth Labson Freeman in the U.S. Northern District of California court, it was determined that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and its governor Yasir Al-Rumayyan would be subject to discovery and depositions in the United States, which posed a significant setback for LIV’s legal team.
LIV’s legal team appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to delay the discovery process. Judge Freeman granted the PIF and Al-Rumayyan’s motion for a stay of discovery pending the appeal. According to Jodi Balsam, a professor at Brooklyn Law School and former counsel for the NFL, the appeal process could take 1-2 years.
Read more: US Judge Denies LIV Golf Request To Delay Hearing
The Tour expressed concern about the disparate treatment regarding discovery requests and suggested that the opposing party may be engaging in strategic tactics.
Judge Freeman denied the PGA Tour’s request for a stay of all discovery, despite their cross-motion.
“Memories fade, and documents may disappear over time. Thus, a full halt of discovery would harm the litigation process,” the court filing read. Judge Freeman also called the Tour’s gamesmanship claim “unconvincing.”
The initial lawsuit was initiated in August 2022 by Phil Mickelson and was later joined by 10 other players. However, it has now been taken over by LIV Golf, a company mostly funded by the PIF. The PIF is a wealth fund established in 1971 by the Saudi Arabian administration to invest in multiple projects and businesses and has been valued at more than $650 billion.
Featured News
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Crypto Exchange Kraken Buys NinjaTrader for $1.5 Billion
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Airbnb Caught in Contradiction Over EU’s Digital Markets Act
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Atkore Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Denying Copyright for AI-Generated Art
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li